The bill presumes your guilt unless you can prove otherwise. The bill is an unnecessary law and a waste of money. Barnett's excuse that the bill is to protect protesters & others is a furphy. Why do bureaucrats always bring up the safety issue when they want to bring in new laws? They don't seem to care and bring in strong laws to protect us against other dangers for eg laws to stop hoons or strong laws to stop recurrent drink drivers killing innocent people on our roads?