• No advertising on The Sydney Opera House
    Approving the use of The Sydney Opera House for blatant advertising in this case will open the floodgates to other questionable decisions and reinforce individuals such as Alan Jones’ power over Governments.
    651 of 800 Signatures
    Created by Elise O’Brien Picture
  • Keep King Island Fish Farm Free
    If fish farms are established in King Island's pristine waters then there will be a massively negative impact environmentally, economically and socially. King Island's economy is based on its clean, green and unspoiled image. If the King Island Brand is tainted by its association with industrial fish farming, and the rapidly accelerating negative press and opposition it is generating, then our economy will be severely affected. The very reasons that attract visitors and residents to King Island are diametrically opposed to the industrialisation of our pristine marine environment. Our way of life and quality of life are under threat just so companies and shareholders can make even more money.
    2,585 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Alison Stubbs Picture
  • Don't build a new airport! DO build high-speed rail instead!
    This petition against building a second airport at Badgery's Creek is urgent and important as to do so would contravene all the independent research findings which clearly demonstrate that societies and nature would suffer unduly. Conversely, building high-speed rail will address climate-change and revitalise many communities in regional NSW as well as connect to major centres like Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra, being 50% of current air traffic; and will provide for real local jobs. It will also empower people and ensure quality of life to all of us and Nature on whom we depend. This has to be seen as the only sane alternative in today's world.
    1,086 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Maureen Grant
  • No to an airport in Koo Wee Rup
    The draining of the Great Swamp produced some of Victoria's and Australia's highest quality soil, rich in nutrients. The development of an airport, the increase in traffic and the pollution which will follow puts at jeopardy the ability to utilize this land appropriately. Reducing the betterment and better health of all Australians. Currently there are significant infrastructure restraints in the area causing complete grid lock over any long weekend, with even mild increased traffic towards Phillip Island and Gippsland areas. Whilst the structure of the project has been sold to Victorians as a great deal with a foreign company funding construction, it is they who will be distributed all incomes, whilst all tax paying Victorians will be forced to pay the infrastructure bill to develop functioning roads to this service. This will create a huge tax burden for all Victorians whilst only servicing what currently stands as 250,000 Gippslandians. Putting further financial burdens on local residents to prepare current houses for additional requirements necessary for being approximately 7 minutes from the airport and decreasing value of the properties. The government has been urging residents to move further out of the city to manage the housing crisis and when Victorians choose to do this to enjoy the country they then decide to propose an airport that will take away everything we love about living further out. The night sky and stars are part of this and an airport being this close will take that away. The impact on the local wildlife and whether they will be able to reproduce moving into the future. Please help us tell the Government to rethink this plan and relocate it to a more appropriate area.
    72 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Lee P Adamis
  • Government MUST ACT for Williamtown PFAS Contamination!
    The residents of Williamtown learned at the end of 2015 that the community in which they lived had been extensively contaminated by the local RAAF Base. The chemicals in question are known as PFAS (Petro-Fluoro Chemicals) and were released over a number of years as they were used in a firefighting foam despite advice by the manufacturer that these foams be phased out of use. What was of greater concern, was that the Government knew of this contamination spreading into the local environment for at least 3 years prior and had not made the public aware. Since then, action by the Federal Government has been limited to a further study into the extend of the spread of the contamination and a Human Health Risk Assessment, conducted by the Department of Defence itself, to assess these risks. The residents have seen their property values plummet to zero as no one is able to have their houses valued and banks will not lend money to anyone purchasing property in the area. Parents with infants and babies have been forced to remain in the environment, despite the desire to leave to protect their families. The chemicals themselves are considered of great concern by the UN and have been proven to cause health issues in animals, and in some cases humans. The body of research into these chemicals and their effects is emerging, and the Australian Government has been emphasising heavily that they do not believe there is 'consistent evidence' of these causing harm to humans, despite international experts disagreeing, and their own health department providing advice that they should be 'avoided'. The ONLY people with the power to assist residents who simply wish to protect themselves and their children, and move on with their lives is the Federal Government. The Office of the Prime Minister has itself taken control of the response, but in the 12 months since this occurred, absolutely NO ACTION has been initiated. The Prime Minister or Defence Minister has not attended the region and has not met with the residents in an open forum which they desperately need in order to explain the situation. The Federal Senate has itself conducted an inquiry into the situation in 2016 and despite making many recommendations including property buy-backs and financial assistance, these have been ignored by the Prime Minister. Action is needed NOW. The residents should not be trapped in their own homes, desperately hoping for assistance from the government which itself was responsible for contaminating the area. Without community pressure, the Government will NOT take any action and we seek support to create this pressure. Please sign on this page, and if possible write to your local Federal Minister and insist that they raise the issue in Parliament. Thank you Jamie Kelly Father, Husband and Local Resident of Williamtown P.S. Much more information can be found in the Newcastle Herald, as well as other news publications
    10 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Jamie Kelly Picture
    Even if ASF or any other company would pay a fair market price for the land (and we know this would NEVER happen!) the answer to their application SHOULD BE: NO! 1. If the SEAWAY/BROADWATER is meddled with in any shape or form the resulting effect on river tides/sand movement/silting/effect on the ecosystem is anyone's guess? WE CANNOT RISK IT! 2. We need the SPIT and all other open spaces on the Gold Coast to be preserved as our city is full of high-rises, we haven't got enough roads, our public transport system is basically non-existent, traffic is chocked throughout the city 24/7. 3. No development should be allowed north of Sea-World! We need the Spit developed as parkland and for recreation now and for future generations. 4. The Gold Coast, specially the central area where most high-rises are has no park with trees! Our greedy, self-serving council for decades has been selling anything/everything that could be sold... and the raping of the natural environment continues. This city NEEDS a decent large park, such as the Central Park in New York. Humans NEED OXYGEN TO SURVIVE which oxygen comes from TREES! No use to say that the Hinterland has enough trees and oxygen when the coastal winds blow it the other way, away from the coastal region where the high-rises and the biggest traffic exist. 5. ASF and all other companies should once and for all be given the thumbs down as far as the SPIT is concerned!
    17 of 100 Signatures
    Created by AGNES ADORJAN
  • Save the integrity of our Environment Minister: No conflicting portfolios
    This week, in a devastating blow to our environment, Malcolm Turnbull has announced his Government will no longer have a sole Environment Minister, and the Environment portfolio will be combined with the Energy portfolio.1 This consolidation of responsibilities represents an unacceptable conflict of interest.2 Furthermore, Malcolm has appointed Josh Frydenberg for this role, a minister who openly supports the expansion of coal mining across Australia, despite his position that there is a “strong moral case” for coal3 is at odds with the policies and research of the World Bank, the UN and the global energy agencies3,4. Of further concern, Frydenberg has said the government was keen to curb “vexatious litigation” from citizens opposed to mining projects over their impact upon the climate, water supplies and threatened species.3 This appointment comes at a time when: 1. The first six months of 2016 has had temperatures ~1.38 °C above average.5 2. 93% of the Great Barrier Reef has been affected by coral bleaching,6 3. Mangroves in the Gulf of Carpentaria, essential to filtering water from the mainland, and breeding fish, are dying back;7 Josh supported the approval of Adani’s huge Carmichael coal mine in QLD, which will export up to 60m tonnes of coal a year through the Great Barrier Reef. Australians were concerned about this coal mining expansion8 and many anticipated the dredging would impact the reef while Government officials denied it would be affected,9 and now?.. Bleached. To highlight the conflict of interest between the Environment and Energy portfolios, this month we have seen Rio Tinto trying to sell its massive Blair Athol coal mine for $1 … ultimately transferring the risk & costs for environmental rehabilitation back on the Queensland taxpayer.10 A heartbreaking example of sacrificing our environment for the interests of coal mining companies is the handover this month of historical “Tarwyn Park”, the home of ‘Natural Sequence Farming’, to a Korean owned coal mining company; now, the farm of Peter Andrews, who was awarded a Medal of the Order of Australia for “service to conservation and the environment through the development and promotion of sustainable farming practises” will become an open cut coal mine. 11 Shale gas fracking, overseen by the Energy Minister, is known to be detrimental to the environment; "from contaminated water, to marred landscapes, to increased global warming pollution, fracking has been an environmental disaster".12 Despite this, the Never Never region of the Northern Territory is poised to be fracked.13 Without a dedicated Environment minister, Australians facing genuine environmental concerns on the frontline risk having no receptive representation at the Federal level to turn to. On a daily basis our agricultural and rural communities are facing threats from mining, for example: • Bulga residents have fought for six years to save their town from the Warkworth coal mine expansion. 14 They won two court cases against the project, but Rio Tinto and the NSW Government joined forces against them, and re-approved the mine. Now, Bulga residents are out of options ~ wouldn’t it be appropriate if they had a Federal Environment Minister they could turn to who didn’t also directly support the very industry that is threatening them? • In the Pilliga forest, Santos aim to drill 850 coal seam gas wells.15 Despite insisting CSG projects pose no threat to our water supply, Santos has poisoned an aquifer in the Pilliga Forest.16 Now, the aquifer is filled with uranium at 20 times the safe drinking water levels, with elevated levels of arsenic, lead, aluminium, nickel, barium and boron. Their planned Narrabri Gas Project risks the Great Artesian Basin, a lifeline for many of the driest parts of Australia representing future water security for many. How can one Minister be legitimately and fairly responsible both for the mining and the environment in this situation? We demand an Environment Minister who understands the gravity of climate change, and acknowledges the urgent need to effectively protect our land & water to sustain Australians for generations to come. Keeping this portfolio with Josh Frydenberg, a vocal advocate for coal, who is also responsible for the Energy portfolio, presents an unacceptable conflict of interest. 1. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-18/malcolm-turnbull-unveils-new-look-ministry/7638492 2. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/combined-energy-and-environment-portfolio-for-josh-frydenberg-a-huge-blow-for-great-barrier-reef-20160718-gq89eo.html 3. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/oct/18/josh-frydenberg-puts-strong-moral-case-for-coal-exports-to-prevent-deaths 4. http://m.huffingtonpost.com.au/edward-cavanough/coal-wont-solve-energy-poverty-renewables-will/?utm_content=buffer9fbf9&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer 5. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/month/aus/summary.shtml 6. https://www.coralcoe.org.au/only-7-of-the-great-barrier-reef-has-avoided-coral-bleaching/ 7. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/queenslands-mangrove-ecosystem-dying-in-secret-20160515-govikm.html 8. http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2011/11/03/3355047.htm 9. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-20/julie-bishop-chides-barack-obama-over-climate-change-remarks/5906570 10. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-12/rio-tinto-selling-massive-queensland-coal-mine-for-dollar/7588916 11. http://tarwynpark.com/ 12. http://www.ecowatch.com/10-years-of-fracking-its-impact-on-our-water-land-and-climate-1891114363.html 13. http://nationalunitygovernment.org/content/rinehart-and-shale-gas-companies-licensed-frack-indigenous-and-pastoral-land 14. http://www.singletonargus.com.au/story/3487977/rally-to-save-bulga/ 15. http://www.csgfreenorthwest.org.au/ 16. http://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/2137939/santos-fined-1500-uranium-at-20-times-safe-levels
    333 of 400 Signatures
    Created by Julia Walsh Picture
  • Save CSIRO Climate Scientists - CSIRO Board suspend CEO LarryMarshal
    Larry Marshal's autocratic decision threatens a globally important function of the CSIRO, climate change modelling. It also risks the loss of up to 350 highly skilled Climate Scientists and modelers. There is national and international outrage against Mr Marshal's decision plus his clear lack of consultation with key stakeholders and the CSIRO Board. His decision must be subject to due process and wider community consultation. The CSIRO is not the private domain or plaything of one man, his ego or his positional power. The CSIRO is a national asset where capacity takes years to build, no one has the right to make arbitrary decisions of this significance.
    39 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Bill MacDonald
  • Call for creation of the position of Freeway Commissioner
    Freeways are a far larger source of artificial (man made) infrasound than any other source. The potential health impact is substantial given the high population density.
    10 of 100 Signatures
    Created by David Higginbottom
  • use marker dye or stop herbicide spraying in public parks and along foot paths
    the onkaparinga council has been telling contractors to spray without marker dye because they have been having so many complaints about spraying in public parks and along foot paths. they are trying to silence the complaints by underhanded sneaky methods instead of listening to their constituents and either ceasing to use these toxic chemicals in areas where children and pets play and expose themselves unknowingly to these chemicals . if hte council wont listen to the publics wishes regarding chemical use in public spaces then the public at least has a right to know where the chemicals have been applied so they can avoid exposure. recent research has shown that glyphosate preperations are toxic to humans in a variety of ways not the least of which is toxicity inducing apoptosis in human placental, embryonic and stemcells this is peer reviewed research carried out by Nora Benachour and Gilles-Eric Séralini * of the University of Caen, Laboratory for Estrogens and Reproduction, UPRES EA 2608, Institute of Biology, Caen 14032, France the complete reference is below. following the publication of htis research and many other simmilar research in to the toxic effects of glyphosate france and several other european nations have banned its use in public spaces and further restricted its use elsewhere Glyphosate Formulations Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis in Human Umbilical, Embryonic, and Placental Cells Nora Benachour and Gilles-Eric Séralini * University of Caen, Laboratory Estrogens and Reproduction, UPRES EA 2608, Institute of Biology, Caen 14032, France Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2009, 22 (1), pp 97–105 DOI: 10.1021/tx800218n Publication Date (Web): December 23, 2008
    7 of 100 Signatures
    Created by punjehl crane
  • Raising the standard of politics
    It has been said that low trust is the biggest tax we will ever pay as every interaction takes longer when trust is low! A two-line email can take an hour to write when trust is low. Trust in politicians is now so low more and more of us are disengaging from politics (not just disaffected youth or Muslims) as the best way to drive social discourse. True leaders ask difficult questions and listen to the responses. In case there is any confusion here are a few examples. We don’t trust you to: 1. be honest with us. We understand people change their minds with better information but we believe you make election promises you never intend to fulfill and then repeat the same patronising denials until everyone gets sick of it. 2. not to put self interest ahead of what's good for Australia. We believe you denigrate and ridicule good ideas from the other party simply to boost your electoral prospects. 3. not silence really important conversations with rhetoric designed to incite fear and distrust and promote your electoral prospects. 4. engage the community in really difficult conversations where you can’t control the answer. 5. not to label anyone with a differing opinion to yours as un-Australian, crossing the line or not on the team. As probably the first generation ever to hand the world on to our children in a worse state than we inherited it, it’s a sad indictment that many of your voters feel the really big conversations (climate change, security etc.) are too important to entrust to politicians.
    63 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Andrew Lee
  • Say NO to chopping down the Whitsunday Areas Coconut Trees.
    Coconut trees feed people, they are a beautiful tree along the foreshores and keep the beaches stable from erosion. They are visually relaxing as well. Sell the coconuts to all the visitors that come to the Whitsunday Areas to recoup the costs of maintaining them.
    194 of 200 Signatures
    Created by ROBERT PHILLIPS